Thursday, November 26, 2020
Home Cointelegraph News Court tosses out short-sellers’ lawsuit targeting Overstock’s 'digital dividend'

Court tosses out short-sellers’ lawsuit targeting Overstock’s 'digital dividend'

A Utah federal judge has tossed out a lawsuit that accused Overstock ($OSTK) of market manipulation by distributing a ‘digital dividend’ of security tokens to shareholders and repeatedly revising retail earnings guidance upward to punish short-sellers.

U.S. district judge Dale Kimball granted two motions to dismiss the suit on September 28, finding that the digital dividend did not manipulate the market, and that the revised earnings statements were protected by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act. In his judgement Kimball said:

“On the day that Overstock announced the dividend, market observers recognized and publicized that the digital dividend would place short sellers in a pickle by forcing them to cover their short positions to avoid breaching pre-existing contractual obligations.”

The lawsuit was filed by Mangrove Partners Master Fund in September 2019, two months after Overstock, a former-online retailer-turned crypto retailer, announced its digital dividend. The dividend airdropped ‘OSTKO’ security tokens to Overstock shareholders at a ratio of one token for every ten shares. 

Mangrove claimed that conditions that prohibited the token’s sale until six months after distribution were intended to make it hard for shorters to cover their positions, and accused Overstock of engineering an artificial short squeeze.

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission later launched an investigation into the actions of Overstock and its executives, subpoenaing documents concerning the dividend, in addition to communications with the firm’s former CEO Patrick Byrne.

Judge Kimball ruled that Byrne’s “very public disdain” for shorters (he made numerous disparaging comments about them) was not relevant to the case as “there was a legitimate business purpose for issuing the dividend.”

He summed up the lawsuit as “a classic attempt to plead fraud by hindsight.”

Speaking to Law360, Byrne’s attorney Robert Driscoll said: “Federal securities laws do not serve as investment insurance and the court agreed.”

Popular Articles

Charted: Ripple (XRP) Retreats Sharply, $0.50 Is The Key For Next Increase

Ripple retested the $0.7500 resistance level before a sharp decline against the US Dollar, similar to bitcoin and ETH. XRP price is holding the...

Ethereum Has Entered a New Bull Market as ETH is Dwarfing Everything in the Crypto Space

Although Ethereum’s price has slightly corrected in the past 24 hours, ETH is still trading up by 262 percent year-to-date. Ethereum has reached a...

OKEx announces impending reopening of withdrawals

After a month of confusion and wariness, OKEx users have finally received the response they have waited for. A few days after popular crypto-exchange...

Coinbase cries ‘false’ as it pre-empts NYT story alleging racial discrimination

A day after popular crypto-exchange Coinbase announced that it will be suspending margin trading in light of recent regulations, the exchange is in the...

Bitcoin Falls as Mnuchin [Reportedly] Plans to Regulate Private Wallets

Bitcoin prices crashed by almost $1,000 on Thanksgiving eve, logging their worst declines in three weeks as traders grappled with overbought conditions and rumors...

Mike Novogratz says Bitcoin Volatility Will “Smooth Out” Due to One Major Factor

As Bitcoin’s price has continued to rally in the past few weeks, many have been discussing the future outlook of the cryptocurrency’s price. Bitcoin...